飛雪
19 篇文章
why do u don't u think what i do think so so?
we're actually not doing maths,
so it's quite unnecessary to put it into for example N,Q,R ...ect.
just take x as a viriable is enough. or we can define it as "logical existence".
翔,never mind whenever u join this discussion or not, it makes little difference.
//3. 我之前的post己經說過你全能的定義不好, 因為: i. 這定義的邏輯語法不符合慣常的邏輯語法. // <---這是填鴨的想法
//ii. 我之前嘗試解讀你的定義,其意為:如果f1 至fn 的宇宙狀態存在, 則某宙狀態可以創造所有y 並毀滅所有有y .
但這不符合我們全能的概念, 全能的概念應為: 所有x, 如果x 能做所有事, 則x 是能的. 你不應一開始便把C 和D 寫進定裡.// <---你好像不懂什麼是歸謬法.
ps...閱讀更多
to be more precise...
{f1(x),f2(x),...,fn(x)}
(sry 有點煩/..)
(E)[f1(x)^...^fn(x)] should be
{f1(x)^...^fn(x)}
翔
that is, should we define
(E)x(E)y [xCy --> -(xDy)]
as an element of
(E)[f1(x)^...^fn(x)]
(in fact u havn't point out what makes this definition of omnipotent "not good".)
(hard to type logical symbols here..)
(hope ur still in this forum )
翔
yes, f(i)x should be fi(x)
in fact i discovered this fault right after i posted the message, but i was quite sure that ppl can catch the meaning from f1(x)...fn(x) so i didn't bother to correct it. anyway, thanks.
however i think u failed to catch the essence of my question.
我還是希望看看和仔的意見.
翔, 你好像不太清楚...還是看看我答joejones的留言再講吧.
翔,at least u have to give a reason, or an suggestion.
翔,你看看這裡第一個留言,說說你的看法吧.
衷心同意Nobody所言.
明月你個死妹丁, 鬧我的小長空!?
我卻可以一次過複製無數個100%相同的人,原因是:
這任意數目的複製人,處身的時空也完全一樣,所以像疊羅漢般重疊在一起.
(仲玩唔玩得?)
我愛梁朝偉.
haha..
why no Mr.Lee's reply on my question!? >_< ..
let's presume that our universe is finite.
----------
可以這樣"dun"腳-->
明月+無名+飛雪殘劍+joejoneS
分分鐘可以在牌局中領會哲道的最高境界.
to:JoeJoneS(2003-01-25 14:11:31)
我的想法是,
f(i)x是某個可能的宇宙狀態,
(E)x [f(i)x] 即表示x能存在於f(i)x這狀態.
而 (E)x [f1(x)^f2(x)^…. ^fn(x)] 可以視作推論的假設.
然後要探討哪些命題有資格成為{f1(x), f2(x),…. , fn(x)}這集合的elements.
現在問題是:
”複合命題”在集合中的存在性,是否應根據”簡單命題”而決定? (複合/簡單是相對而言.)
JoeJoneS和各位有什麼看法? 謝謝賜教…
─────────────
to:文2003-01-25 13:58:24
對白超...閱讀更多
喜歡思考的人啊!
很欣賞網上巡警的用心,但我想這裡每位網友都是對思考很有興趣和心得的,否則就不會樂於觀看此網頁呢.只不過是大家同樣喜歡說笑罷了,在笑話中也可以看到優秀的思考的,順其自然吧.
這裡有一條思考性的問題,
是小弟之前的post,
但得不到回應,重貼如下--->
以下是關於「全能者」這招牌問題的淺見：
(A)= universal qualifier
(E)= existential qualifier
y = elements in the universal set
C = create
D = destroy
[f1(x), f2(x),…. , fn(x)] = all pos...閱讀更多