asd

To andycool Who are '半邊正義份子' ? How do you define it? You are making your own straw man and seem to be very much enjoying yourself in attacking it. Strange enough!

To andycool //如果是 essay,則它會是argumentative 'essay'? 認為涵蘊的人就證明一下.責任在你. 注意:是邏輯推理,而不是推測. 如果...則...是邏輯學上的概念,不是心理學上的概念! // Do you know what you're talking about? I don't. I said, 'I would rather call 哈哈哈哈's stories a piece of satire.' From this, it's natural for me to add: 'It is NOT a good piece of argum...閱讀更多

To qwe I would rather call 哈哈哈哈's stories a piece of satire. It is NOT a good piece of argumentative 'essay'. (You call it an essay.)

To qwe No doubt, SOME stories can illustrate one's points of views. However, stories can never replace formal arguments and systematic reasoning. Usually, they are used to further strengthen and elaborate the arguments which have already been put forward before. The 'story of 一泡' written by Dr Lee ...閱讀更多

To qwe 1. asd's message to 哈哈哈哈://Only those guys who can't argue curse others; And those guys who can't give evidence talk nonsense; Above all, those who can neither argue nor give evidence, invent stories. What a shame! // 2. qwe's response to asd //Don't just curse others, give your own evidence....閱讀更多

Let the cat out of the bag! By 'asd' I mean: Assure all of you the Service here in this platform is absolutely Decent. This is no secret as all participants can see how the service is and feel how you are entertained. However, my regret is : There are indeed a lot of meaningless messages here, eithe...閱讀更多

To 哈哈哈哈 Only those guys who can't argue curse others; And those guys who can't give evidence talk nonsense; Above all, those who can neither argue nor give evidence, invent stories. What a shame!

To 踢爆 Only those guys who can't argue curse others; And those guys who can't give evidence talk nonsense.

Please be rational! 踢爆: You're talking nonsense.

Please focus, no diversion! genius: Would you stop arguing on whether or not Mr 張海澎 is 'a Master in Thinking Art', please? I repeat: it has nothing to do with the discussion. Please focus on the valid arguments rather than on the 'invalid arguments directed at the man'. Thanks.

Be rational! Whether Mr 張海澎 is 'a Master in Thinking Art' or not has nothing to do with the discussion. Please focus on the valid arguments rather than on the 'invalid arguments directed at the man'. Up to now , Mr 張海澎 has been trying hard in presenting himself with good reasoning. However, to my d...閱讀更多

Free to choose A point to add: As long as one's life is uniquely owned and managed by oneself, one is absolutely free to choose as to how one's own life is to be 'consumed' or 'disposed of'. The key point is that one is totally responsible to one's act, no matter whether one is a dead or still alive...閱讀更多

Euthanasia(安樂死) ? tigger: //2003-04-04 12:25:20 係咪問我們是否贊成''安樂死''? // Euthanasia(安樂死) is obviously not the same as 'committing suicide'. Though I am of the opinion that one's life is uniquely owned and managed by oneself, and thus even if committing suicide is foolish, I show my respect to one's deci...閱讀更多

To 張海澎 你展示了高水平的思維！ Bravo!

To 明月 //他尊重的,是他哥哥這個" 人 ", 不是" 自殺 "這種行為. // Do you accept the following statement? 'I respect your decision.' If yes, then logically, you must also respect one's behaviour because decision is a kind of behaviour. Thus, there is nothing wrong to say 'I respect your act of committing suicide.' //一個人死了,...閱讀更多

You may show respect , but don't help him! I said:'As one's life was bestowed by Nature and uniquely belongs to the individual, one's life is absolutely owned and discretionarily managed by oneself.' (asd 2003-04-03 20:18:46) In this connection, therefore, committing suicide is merely one's choice a...閱讀更多

To 明月 //不要把" 感情包袱 " (好肉麻) 強加於自己或別人身上. 你貼文中的" owe ",絕非" owe Mary an apology " 咁簡單. // When one says 'I own you a lot, especially when it comes to affections', I think it has nothing to do with 'being imposed on oneself or others' (強加於自己或別人身上). One feels one is indebted because one knows one has got a...閱讀更多

To 明月 //唔好同我講話欠咩感情呀, 養育恩呀(其實都係感情既一種) D咁文藝既野, 除左寫小說, 感情呢味野係冇得還既,係咪? 所以, 欠D乜? - 唔明! // Yes, by 'However, suicide is surely immoral because those commit suicide owe a lot to many others, especially their parents and the beloved ones', I refer to what you said above. Actually, by definition, 'owe' can m...閱讀更多

To 楚鳳歌 As one's life was bestowed by nature and uniquely belongs to the individual, one's life is absolutely owned and discretionarily managed by oneself. Others, including one's parents, are NOT entitled to 'manipulate' it. That is why most nations do not treat suicide to be illegal. Hence, you ca...閱讀更多

To andycool (anycool = andycool? I suppose it was a typo.) anycool //和選擇性不明白的人討論,很沒趣// 我不明白就是不明白，為何要說我「選擇性不明白」？明顯你犯了不當預設的謬誤。記得嗎？當你不掌握「自我推翻」的概念時，我嘗試用了不同方法向你解釋過兩次，我何曾說過你「選擇性不明白」？ 我希望第三者對此表示意見。

To webmaster. Sorry, I had accidentally sent my posting thrice because I re-sent them when the server did not return my message. Could the webmaster delete the extra messages, please? Thanks.

To Benson Right, we're not divided. Thanks for your response.

To andycool --- 概念不清 1. //說來說去,閣下也未能回答我的問題.有何理由要就思考層面去批評接字遊戲?就正如就思考層面去批評100米賽跑一樣.是你自己想當然認為接字遊戲是有腦遊戲,// 我漏答了你這一條問題，確實是我的疏忽。 讓我這樣解釋吧：文字（當然是指「有意義的」文字）必然指涉物件或承載概念；因此，一般來說，當我們說要「耍弄文字」時（如玩接字遊戲），我們是指於思考層面上進行操作文字的活動，如將文字重組、解構等等。 因此，當我們參與對聯、猜謎語、串字等文字遊戲時，我們預期我們是必須用腦的，你同意嗎？由於接字遊戲與上述文字遊戲類同，因此我們也預期玩者須要用腦，這是我的意...閱讀更多

To Benson 1. My posting: //當然，兩者根本不是等同，但「自我推翻 」常包含「自相矛盾」。 // Your reply://Not necessarily. // By the words '常包含', they mean 'quite often but not always'. In other words, my phrase '常包含' is more or less the same in meaning as what you say 'not necessarily'. You are just expressing my idea in a differ...閱讀更多

To Benson //「自我推翻 」並不等同 「自相矛盾」。 // 當然，兩者根本不是等同，但「自我推翻 」常包含「自相矛盾」。

To andycool 1. 請andycool再次閱讀我的貼文﹕//就思考的層面來說，「無難度的遊戲」理所當然正是「無腦遊戲」！這是正確的邏輯推論，也是理由充分的。// 必須注意﹕當我說「無難度的遊戲」是「無腦遊戲」時，是有一條件制約的﹔這個條件就是﹕「就思考的層面來說」。請用天賦的邏輯推論能力思考一下吧﹕「在思考的層面無難度」究竟意味什麼？答案是﹕它意味無須用腦、不須思考，也可簡稱為「無腦」﹔據此，「無難度的遊戲」理所當然正是「無腦遊戲」。 2. //就思考的層面來說,100米賽跑也是無腦遊戲!// 正確！ 3. //但就思考層面來說,有人會那麼無腦的去批評100米賽跑為"無腦遊戲"? ...閱讀更多

To andycool 1. //我的問題是"需不需要"每一個message也很有見地,很有思考性才算是一個以「思考標榜」的網站? 而不是"可不可能". // 我當然明白你所指的「需不需要」。問題是﹕若果答案是「需要」的話，現實上根本就做不到！這正是我上次貼文所說的意思了﹕「憑常識判斷，怎麼說也不可能「每一個message也很有見地」吧！」明乎此，你的問題是沒有甚麼意義的。 2. //我其實看不出為何無難度的遊戲會理所當然的被認為是無腦遊戲.遊戲是有很多方面的價值,緞練腦筋是其中一種價值,但卻不是唯一的價值!遊戲也可以作為娛樂(這是連白癡也知道的廢話)// 3. //因此若有人不給出充份理由就...閱讀更多

回變心 1. //然而「接字遊戲」的另方面的意義，就在於為網友帶來遊戲的趣味性和消閒性，這可不能抹煞的了。 比方說，其他題目是討論場，「接字遊戲」就是讓網友可以聚首輕鬆閒聊的小天地。// 「遊戲的趣味性和消閒性」，對！這是所有遊戲都具有的必然屬性，你其實無須解釋，而且我的批評與此無關。 2. //要說要思考才是有腦，其實「接字」也需要一定程度上的思考的，「接字」二字就說明了，參予者必先思考過才能進入「遊戲」的。// 沒有任何限制，只要能夠接上前文最後一個字的文字遊戲，我認為根本不需要什麼思考。你認為「參予者必先思考過才能進入「遊戲」的」，這大抵是標準不同，我尊重你的看法。 3. //因為網友又...閱讀更多

1. Rayman//我覺得，「接字遊戲」可以是一個反面教材，來對照一下，那些是無聊，那些不是。...所以，「接字遊戲」是有教育意義的！怎會是你認為的「無聊」？ // 同意Rayman兄所言，我倒沒有想過從「反面教材」的面向去分析，謝謝。 2. Werry//你認為如何遊戲才不無聊的? // 我在之前的貼文己說明了！再次解釋吧，不無聊的遊戲有兩大元素：1. 要有難度（即必須用腦）；2. 必須有限制，否則沒有義意。事實上，哪有遊戲沒有規則的？ 3. Werry//asd這個名字有甚麼意思?(好似愛滋) // 你上面的貼文比「無聊的接字遊戲」更無聊！近乎人身攻擊了。請尊重他人，也請自重！ 4. 回...閱讀更多

1. andycool//1.請問是否要每一個message也很有見地,很有"思考性才算是一個"以「思考標榜」的網站"? // 我沒有這麼說過，是你想當然了。而且，憑常識判斷，怎麼說也不可能「每一個message也很有見地」吧！ 2. andycool//2.說穿了只是表達了有網友參與一個沒有難度的遊戲,而所謂的"無腦遊戲,廣受歡迎,不少網友竟樂此不疲",若不是概念扭曲,我希望閣下先解釋一下憑什麼那樣斷定?// 怎樣「概念扭曲」？請詳釋。 所謂「無腦遊戲」，我第一次貼文已解釋過了，再次引述如下﹕「由於沒有規定句子有無義意、句子內容限制、句子字數等等，本網站的「接字遊戲」根本全無難度！換言之，玩...閱讀更多

回明月 明月//你用乜野中文輸入法架？咁快打到咁多字geh? // 說來慚愧，我用的是手寫板！上次我的貼文大部分引用你的文字，我寫的不多，只是你的錯覺而已。

回明月 明月//留心睇睇,大部份玩閣下認為“ 無聊 ”的接字遊戲都有係其他threads度寫過精彩的文章,或討論過嚴肅認真的問題！ // 你的答覆與我的提問毫不相干。你想說明什麼呢？ 明月//做人，唔一定要成日扮嚴肅，扮認真先至自己認為係有料，得閒放鬆下個腦，對思考先有幫助，成日懶道學，好易死架！ // 你說我「扮嚴肅」、「扮認真」？「懶道學」？ 你憑甚麼下此論斷呢？這不是討論問題的正確方法。

Werry//人家都話係遊戲,何必咁認真呢? // 遊戲與認真並非互相排斥，它們可以並存；即，可以存有「認真的遊戲」。正如遊戲可以是有義意的。 PETER PAN //若果你認為無聊，希望你可以設計一些不無聊的遊戲給大家玩，請不要得個講字！ // 你犯了「訴諸不相干的謬誤」。一個遊戲是否無聊，只與此遊戲的如何設計連上關係，它無聊與否和我能不能夠「設計一些不無聊的遊戲給大家玩」沒有相干。 其實，要使此遊戲好玩些（有義意些）也不太難，比方，可以加入下列限制（部分或全部）﹕ 1. 字串必須是四字成語﹔ 2. 字串內容必須與XX有關 3. 字串必須包含數目之類之類。 變心//生活不一定分秒都要很沉重。...閱讀更多

無聊的接字遊戲 由於沒有規定句子有無義意、句子內容限制、句子字數等等，本網站的「接字遊戲」根本全無難度！換言之，玩者無須思考就可以將句子輕易接寫下去，沒完沒了。 以「思考標榜」的網站，為何會出現如此無腦遊戲，而且廣受歡迎，不少網友竟樂此不疲？這現象說明了什麼呢？ 這是較有義意的思考題，你如何解釋呢？回答我的疑問總好過玩如此無聊的接字遊戲吧？（大家可先走去「接字遊戲」討論綱目看看，了解情況。）

A graveyard of nonsense //首頁的討論題目不少是徒有虛名，名不符實，進入此處瀏覽，越來越變得沒有意思了，簡直浪費時間！// Right, I share your insight. It really doesn't make any point reading those nonsense.

? 請問甚麼叫做「子矛子盾法」?何謂「時空有限而無界」?請賜教.